From A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Provide A Short Critique Of Two (2) Of The Following Four Theoretical Frameworks: Functionalism, Rational Choice Theory, Positivism And/or Behaviorism

A Comparison of symbolic Interactionism , Functionalism and quick of scent Choice TheorySymbolic profound interactionism stipulates that mint act toward things base on the inwardness those things get under ones skin for them and these meanings argon derived from societal interaction and modified through definition (Griffin 1997 ) This take aim of thought in sociology delves business officeicularly on the micro-level analysis of piece interaction in golf-club and delves much on how raft translate meaning from the different interactions that they put up with with some another(prenominal) man worlds and the various structures in magnitudeliness . This is in contrast with the hitch of behaviorism that globe merely resolve to a accustomed set of stimuli and hence act entirely in such a way dictated by his natu re . Symbolic interactionism delves much(prenominal) on the creative powers of humans rather than on their nonope reasonable role in establishing meaning (Blumer 1962This special motion is somewhat in contrast with the other major schools on sociological thought , namely Functionalism , sharp-witted Theory and divergence theory , to name some of the more prominent unmatcheds . employ symbolic interactionism as a reward point , bingle may hence evaluate the shortcomings of other schools of thought , narrate , in this guinea pig Functionalism and Rational TheoryFunctionalism delves more on the large level and treats agents as passive recipients of various social stimuli . Functionalism entails that society works much uniform an beingness w here(predicate) homeostasis is the average and that they primaeval to change is a dull change in one type , slowly bed covering to the umpteen other co-ordinated constituents establishing new connections , so to speak , in soci ety as a livelong - a straw man geared mor! e towards a balance between the many aspects of social interaction . For instance , one might count on at society as an organism and that each part serves to sustain the whole organism .

Each part of that organism is an essential part and a drastic change in one of the move is felt by society as a wholeConsider for instance the role of the disposal , military , mart , and the various improvement sectors . We may liken society as an organism , with the government being the head , the military being the white occupation cells that protect the body from foreign organisms , and the commercialise and the service se ctors , as foods and hands and /or feet . We may see that in this particular perspective , every facet of social reality is crucial and that institutions determine how and why agents act and interactRational pick theory , on the other hand , focuses more on the rationality of actions and institutions in society . This is more akin to functionalism in many value as it delves more with the necessity of trusted acts and responses as stepping stones towards symmetricalness . A key concept here is that rational choice theory asserts that humans make finish whether individually or collectively based on rational choices However , an ready shortcoming of this perspective is that it assumes that rationality is the norm and that interactions are based on rational choices . Basic psychological science , however , would itemise us that most of our choices spring more form inclinations...If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to ge! t a full essay, visit our page: write my paper