'The Anatomy of a Decision\r'

'At the end of John Updike’s suddenly story, all the main(prenominal) characters were at betting odds with each other. A&P securities industry stack away clerk Sammy, who is the main protagonist of the story, Lengel the manager of the grocery store, and the collar two-year-old bikini-clad ladies who caught Sammy’s attention, were all reason over the dress code of the store.The ladies in bikinis just came by to buy a herring snacks from the grocery, much to the delight of Sammy, who enjoyed law-abiding and sexually fantasizing about the bodies of the cardinal women.However, the ladies were reprimanded by Lengel for their inappropriate habit which he deemed should al angiotensin-converting enzyme be worn in a beach. Seeing that the ladies of his interest were embarrassed, Sammy willingly leave offices from his employment in revisal to stand for what he feels is right. On a personal none, although his finish to quit his job as a store clerk in order to protect the ladies’ interests is notable, I do not agree with Sammy’s actions apparently because it was dark-green and irrational.At the beginning of the story, Sammy fantasizes about the ladies, who enter the grocery store in bikinis, like whatsoever young boy would. He observes their clothing and bodies in a precise diminutive manner as if he treasured to remove them himself: â€Å"There was this chunky one, with a two-piece. It was bright green and the seams on the brassiere were subdued sharp and her belly was bland pretty pale” (Updike, 1961).He also comes up with his own opinion of their personalities: â€Å"There was this one, with one of those chubby berry-faces, the lips all bunched together low her nose, this one, and tall one, with black hair that had not quite frizzed right…. You know their grade of girl other girls think genuinely ‘Striking’ and ‘Attractive.’ She was the queen with ‘Long clear prima -Donna legs’” (Updike, 1961). In short, his vivid descriptions of the three ladies no doubt show that he has a profound interest in them, which taints the virtuous justification of his finding to quit his job.Initially, it would fall out that his resignation was mainly to protest the indefensible embarrassment that his boss, Lengel, caused the ladies. However, as shown in the end, Sammy’s move was primarily for the purpose of appearing as a hero to the three women.When he decided to quit his job, Sammy give tongue to, â€Å"The girls, and whod reprobate them, are in a move to get out, so I sound out ‘I quit’ to Lengel quick becoming for them to hear, hoping theyll stop and watch me, their unsuspected hero.” kernel to say, although he pointed out that he resigned in protest of his manager’s acrimonious actions towards the ladies, his actions were simply meant for show.Clearly, Sammy’s actions were signs of immaturity, which is arguably commonality among people his age. One does not simply quit a job in order to show off to women. His decision lowlife be likened to a young boy desperately trying to impress a girl he likes, plainly fails in his attempt. He is a important case of acting first without thinking and tho realizing the folly of his actions after comprehend the end result, which is expectedly not what he desires. Sammy seemingly acted on impulse and as a result, the consequences were severe.As implied in the story, Sammy’s job as a clerk in the A&P grocery store is very important to his parents, who possibly partially depend on his income. As Lengel said in his attempt to convince Sammy to see his decision to quit, â€Å"Sammy, you don’t call for to do this to your Mom and Dad” (Updike, 1961.). It can then be deduced that Sammy was not only working for himself but also help his parents augment their family income.Meaning to say, Sammy’s decision to resign from his job possibly had a great impact than what he imagined. And he realized this in the end, as he knew that his parents would not understand and accept that the reason stooge his sacrifice to protest the actions of Lengel, whom he believes was very harsh towards the girls.Furthermore, despite his belief that what he did was heroic, Sammy cannot, in any way, be conceived as a hero in the scope of the story simply because his efforts were fruitless. Although it can be argued that Sammy symbolizes a revolt against the prejudicial learning ability epitomized by Lengel, in the end, the former still gained nothing out of his actions and therefore, cannot be considered as someone who fought for a justifiable cause.\r\n'